OK people, my Covid 19 stuff is harsh. It is designed that way because after reading the previous 150 posts I assume you wish to progress further and / or test your new found skills.
I will alternate between publishing and unpublishing the Covid posts as Google ask me to.
Critical Thought requires several skills. One of which is decent emotional control. Reading a 'scary' Covid article without fear is proof of emotional control.
Emotional control is important as this shows an ability to withstand the fear inducing media coverage of mostly everything. The media sensationalise most things as that generates interest and revenue. This proves that most people lack an ability to critically think as they allow the press to do it for them. These same people allow 'experts' to tell them what to think. My critical thought posts are there to provoke thought, critical thought. Not just about the posts but about the topics the post addresses.
The Government and banking sectors both use fear to maintain control over the uncritical thinking masses. They just do and always will. Without the element of fear banking and government both collapse to negligible entities.
That was a warm up. Critical Thought differs from regimented 'scientific discovery' in that it explores a great many ideas at speed. What might take the scholars 100 years can be done far quicker with a population of critical thinkers.
Let us assume that Covid 19 is thirty times more deadlier than the seasonal flu. Is this a problem? Is Covid 19 as deadly as the Spanish Flu from 1918. Is that a problem?
Your risk tolerance is entirely your own affair. A Government doesn't have the right to decide for you, yet they do and will if you let them.
Let me direct this post towards the Covid 19 exit strategy.
EXIT STRATEGY
First of all, the UK banks and government are doing an excellent job. They just are. As is Boris Jonhson and his Covid 19 team.
The concepts I will discuss next are likely but more data will be needed to ensure that they are reasonable. You ought to be able to follow the logic of my nonsense and compare it to unfolding events up until June 1st 2020.
Come June 1st 2020, the exit strategy will likely be those with the high risk comorbidities need to take additional care.
Aged 40 or less, go about your life as normal without restictions.
Aged 50 or less, try and eat healtier and do some exercise. Other than that, go about your life without restrictions.
Aged 60 and over or 40 and over with risky comorbidities, you need to self isolate until this thing is effectively over.
So, what about the over sixties with kids at school? Not mine or societies problem. Covid 19 may well 'solve' this particluar cicumstance. As it will many others.
This all based on Covid 19 being 30 times more deadly than the flu. Are the under 40's concerned about dying from the flu? What about flu that is 30 times more deadly to them? I wouldn't think so.
Those who are 60 and over will likely have cause to think about getting a flu vaccine. These people will be concerned about Covid 19 if it is 30 times more deadly. Self isolation is justified. As would being furloughed for life.
An effective vaccine would make Covid 19 far less deadly and so there would be no need for any restrictions.
This all comes to me based on doing lots of research and using critical thought to synthesise an obvious response. Today is April 25th 2020. Let us see what happens for the next few weeks and if I have 'stumbled' upon the 'facts' let us see what is implemented from 1st June 2020.
Now, with Critical Thought that is free from fear comes confidence in your own opinion and the ability to detect the truth in others statements. Which is nice. I have stated my assumption, that being covid 19 being 30 times deadlier than the flu. This may or may not be correct. My Covid 19 exit strategy is based on various age groups opinion of nomal flu. It isn't difficult.
So, if covid 19 is less than 30 times more deadlier than 'flu', then my exit strategy still makes sense.
So, if Covid 19 is even 100 times more deadlier than the 'flu', then my exit strategy still makes sense as the under forties would still not be overly concerned.
My point here is that my Covid 19 coverage is not sensationalist and is not going to cause anyone any concern. However, taking a few sentences out of context or not actually critically thinking will create anxiety. For example, I did write that Covid 19 could be 100 times more deadly than the flu. Actually, I wrote that it wouldn't really matter if it was as my suggested exit strategy still functions reasonably well.
My proposed exit strategy does not depend upon effective treatments or a vaccine. That won't impress government, bankers and the health industry.
Government want a solution that makes them look powerful
Banks want a solution that requires lots of loans to various large institutions underwritten by government.
The health industry want a solution that will generate a great deal of revenue for the health industry.
Considering those three requirements then my proposed exit solution is woefull.
I simply suggest you pay attention over the coming five weeks and see who says what and have a critical thought about why they might say it.
That said, have a critical thought about what I have just written. None of it requires any research. Perhaps meditate for ten minutes and then direct your thoughts towards this post, without fear. Does the truth of it resonate with you or do you have a better proposal?
If you have a better solution, discuss it with others, comment below, get on youtube, do something. I don't care if I am right or wrong. I truly don't.
If this Covid 19 is 100 times more deadly than the flu, I don't care. My odds of dying from the flu is, as far as I am concerned, zero. 100 times zero is still zero. I am 51, so I might be wrong. I accept that and my reasons for doing so is none of you business.
That said, I will unpublish the 'Covid' posts as this platform is owned by others and it is reasonable for me to comply with their wishes. I will also re-publish them, from time to time.
Take care and have some fun
The serious comorbidities are high blood pressure and diabetes so sort yourselves out. You can achieve this however you wish. I have provided help in my books, you may or may not find this help valuable. That is your own business.
Be seeing you
(I am not going to proof read this or spell check it as I am hungry and there are better uses for my time, finite as it is.)
TTFN
The journey and the destination?
25 April, 2020
18 April, 2020
One Million Deaths (UK edition)
Actually, this is meant as an uplifting post.
The current 'thing' could easily kill one million UK citizens. Hence the title. For those in the US, the title ought to read Four Million Deaths.
These numbers come from two general observations:-
80% of us aren't really in any danger from this thing.
20% of us will become seriously ill and 10% of those will die.
CFR is therefore just 2%
If our health systems do get overwhelmed then CFR will rise to 3% Thus matching the Spanish Flu 100 years ago.
So, why are our Governments freaking out with these lockdowns?
Well, we may start to question why we bother with Government if they are so ineffective at dealing with actual problems. The WHO for example, give guidance to Govt who then repeat it without thought back to the populations. In this example Govts are seen to be pointless and the WHO guidance has been woeful fairly often in this crisis.
All the Govt can do, to look powerful and / or useful, is to keep deaths closer to 2% rather than 3%. The lockdowns are there to 'save' around half a million UK souls. Or 2 million US souls. The deaths are not important. Government itself is merely trying to survive this crisis.
Simply put, Government is like vvery expensive car / auto insurance that only ever pays out small claims. Despite grand claims to 'protect' you, large claims are dismissed because of reasons.
So, the lockdowns are there to protect just 1% of the population.
Psychologically speaking, lockdowns are necessary as 3% of the population dying in the next two months would be massively significant and very distructive of the public trust in government. So, the longer government can drag this thing out for, the more chance that the public trust remains reasonably intact.
This may shed some light on why some governemts are trying to blame the Chinese govt for this pandemic rather than their own botched attempts at preventing it gaining a foot hold in their geographical location.
Hopefully that dose of reality hasn't overwhelmed the ancient parts of your brain / central nervous systems and you are in a position to hear the good news?
There are millions of Doctors who follow their Govt guidelines to the letter. Remembering that a few at the WHO write up these guidleines. however, some Doctors have ideas of their own. Some Doctors have come up with their own guidelines and are using known medicines to create effective treatments for their patients. I can think of two at the moment, one of which Trump likes the sound of.
The Governments want the ventillator treatment to be the 'one' official treatment along with Lockdowns as this combination has us all belieiving in the value of government and obeying police officers.
As more of us start discussing 'alternative' treatments on facebook and then posting stuff about how they helped a loved one. The Government position will magically change. The unofficial treatments will become official. Studies will be released that our governments will readily take credit for. The death rate of 2% falls below 0.2% and lockdowns are magically lifted for all but the most vulnerable.
This is not the fault of government. We are forcing them to play this role. This is just a consequence of the 'real world' that we insist we live in. A world where there is always someone to blame. Personal accountability and responsibility are not held in high regard. Compliance with those in authority is what we are all taught by everybody else. Fear of non-compliance stops most Doctors from prescribing effective treatments and preventatives to their patients. The same fear stops us, the patient, from demanding these effective treatments.
Fear will kill 2-3% of us.
Confidence in our selves and others would reduce the deaths by more than 90%
Was that uplifting or not?
I suppose it depends upon whether or not you are fearful.
Normally, vacines take four years to come to market. When government survival is at stake, this will drop to six months. Assuming we are technologically competent enough to produce a vacine at all. We already have the necessary medications to reduce the CFR to 0.2% of us, so I am not overly concerned with government propaganda and displays of power.
The actual intended uplifting tone of this piece is entirely dependent upon you, the reader, being in control of your fear responses. Master your fear and you will be able to acquire preventatives in a matter of hours or days. Wait until the government tells you what to do and experience shortages and delays of months.
************************************************************************
I have mentioned a CFR, how many of us will potentially die, of 2% as my base line. This is entirely dependant upon this being a natural virus. If some clowns developed it in a lab, a clown is a US dollar funded and trained scientist, then expect that 2% to climb up towards 10% within a year and hopefully be less than 100% in this decade. There will be no recovery from such a virus, merely temporary survival.
For example, our Boris survived the thing but will he recover? Has he lost a third to half of his lung function. How damaged is his heart and liver? How compromised is his immune system? By how much has his life expectancy reduced? I suggest 50% loss is likely and he will not be immune from getting it again and again.
That wasn't quite so uplifting but it goes to show that allowing our governments to be in charge of us might end up proving to be somewhat difficult to survive.
Obviously, I suggest reading my books but that's all I ever do.
Take care and make an attempt to conquer your fears in any way you choose
PS No spell checker, no checking grammar and no proof reading. My time is as valuable as yours.
The current 'thing' could easily kill one million UK citizens. Hence the title. For those in the US, the title ought to read Four Million Deaths.
These numbers come from two general observations:-
80% of us aren't really in any danger from this thing.
20% of us will become seriously ill and 10% of those will die.
CFR is therefore just 2%
If our health systems do get overwhelmed then CFR will rise to 3% Thus matching the Spanish Flu 100 years ago.
So, why are our Governments freaking out with these lockdowns?
Well, we may start to question why we bother with Government if they are so ineffective at dealing with actual problems. The WHO for example, give guidance to Govt who then repeat it without thought back to the populations. In this example Govts are seen to be pointless and the WHO guidance has been woeful fairly often in this crisis.
All the Govt can do, to look powerful and / or useful, is to keep deaths closer to 2% rather than 3%. The lockdowns are there to 'save' around half a million UK souls. Or 2 million US souls. The deaths are not important. Government itself is merely trying to survive this crisis.
Simply put, Government is like vvery expensive car / auto insurance that only ever pays out small claims. Despite grand claims to 'protect' you, large claims are dismissed because of reasons.
So, the lockdowns are there to protect just 1% of the population.
Psychologically speaking, lockdowns are necessary as 3% of the population dying in the next two months would be massively significant and very distructive of the public trust in government. So, the longer government can drag this thing out for, the more chance that the public trust remains reasonably intact.
This may shed some light on why some governemts are trying to blame the Chinese govt for this pandemic rather than their own botched attempts at preventing it gaining a foot hold in their geographical location.
Hopefully that dose of reality hasn't overwhelmed the ancient parts of your brain / central nervous systems and you are in a position to hear the good news?
There are millions of Doctors who follow their Govt guidelines to the letter. Remembering that a few at the WHO write up these guidleines. however, some Doctors have ideas of their own. Some Doctors have come up with their own guidelines and are using known medicines to create effective treatments for their patients. I can think of two at the moment, one of which Trump likes the sound of.
The Governments want the ventillator treatment to be the 'one' official treatment along with Lockdowns as this combination has us all belieiving in the value of government and obeying police officers.
As more of us start discussing 'alternative' treatments on facebook and then posting stuff about how they helped a loved one. The Government position will magically change. The unofficial treatments will become official. Studies will be released that our governments will readily take credit for. The death rate of 2% falls below 0.2% and lockdowns are magically lifted for all but the most vulnerable.
This is not the fault of government. We are forcing them to play this role. This is just a consequence of the 'real world' that we insist we live in. A world where there is always someone to blame. Personal accountability and responsibility are not held in high regard. Compliance with those in authority is what we are all taught by everybody else. Fear of non-compliance stops most Doctors from prescribing effective treatments and preventatives to their patients. The same fear stops us, the patient, from demanding these effective treatments.
Fear will kill 2-3% of us.
Confidence in our selves and others would reduce the deaths by more than 90%
Was that uplifting or not?
I suppose it depends upon whether or not you are fearful.
Normally, vacines take four years to come to market. When government survival is at stake, this will drop to six months. Assuming we are technologically competent enough to produce a vacine at all. We already have the necessary medications to reduce the CFR to 0.2% of us, so I am not overly concerned with government propaganda and displays of power.
The actual intended uplifting tone of this piece is entirely dependent upon you, the reader, being in control of your fear responses. Master your fear and you will be able to acquire preventatives in a matter of hours or days. Wait until the government tells you what to do and experience shortages and delays of months.
************************************************************************
I have mentioned a CFR, how many of us will potentially die, of 2% as my base line. This is entirely dependant upon this being a natural virus. If some clowns developed it in a lab, a clown is a US dollar funded and trained scientist, then expect that 2% to climb up towards 10% within a year and hopefully be less than 100% in this decade. There will be no recovery from such a virus, merely temporary survival.
For example, our Boris survived the thing but will he recover? Has he lost a third to half of his lung function. How damaged is his heart and liver? How compromised is his immune system? By how much has his life expectancy reduced? I suggest 50% loss is likely and he will not be immune from getting it again and again.
That wasn't quite so uplifting but it goes to show that allowing our governments to be in charge of us might end up proving to be somewhat difficult to survive.
Obviously, I suggest reading my books but that's all I ever do.
Take care and make an attempt to conquer your fears in any way you choose
PS No spell checker, no checking grammar and no proof reading. My time is as valuable as yours.
12 April, 2020
How bad can 'things' get?
Hello Everybody,
As we live through these interesting times I thought it may be an idea to 'imagine' how much more interesting 'things' could get.
Let me be clear, I cannot predict the future. What I can easily do is interpret the world around me and then point out what is obvious to me.
At school, when I was around 8 or 9, I remember the salient points but not the detail as to how an important vaccine was developed. Some well intentioned genious / evil monster injected a small furry animal with a dangerous disease and it died. A small blood sample from this poor unfortunate creature was injected into another perfectly healthy small furry animal and it died too. A small blood sample from this poor unfortunate creature was injected into another perfectly healthy small furry animal and it died too. A small blood sample from this poor unfortunate creature was injected into another perfectly healthy small furry animal and it died too. A small blood sample from this poor unfortunate creature was injected into another perfectly healthy small furry animal and it died too. A small blood sample from this poor unfortunate creature was injected into another perfectly healthy small furry animal and it died too. A small blood sample from this poor unfortunate creature was injected into another perfectly healthy small furry animal and it died too. A small blood sample from this poor unfortunate creature was injected into another perfectly healthy small furry animal and it died too. So far, so horrific. I am sure you are geting bored of reading the same sentence over and over. Imagine reading it 100 times.
Eventually, the small furry animals started dying slower and slower, then one survived. Blood from this one was injected into other fury animals, who were dying and some survived the unsurvivable. Fom this painstaking research / inhuman behaviour came a cure for a terrible disease.
That man is apparently some sort of hero but I refuse to recall his name or honour him in anyway. Instead of creating a cure, he may have decided to make an even more deadly virus. He would have injected the virus into a healthy animal, waited until it was really ill then injected some blood into another healthy animal. Read that sentence 100 times.
The difference between the two was one was developing a cure and the other making a virus far more deadly. The difference in action is just the moment at when the blood is drawn. One when the animal has exhausted itself battling the disease, the other when the disease is gaining the upper hand.
This was all hundreds of years ago and we are far more advanced today. We have computers and scientists and labs all over the world funded by the people. However, these computers and scientists are still less effective than simply infecting small furry animals with a virus and then injecting another small furry animal with its infected blood.
About a decade ago, 'we' succeeded. Wealth from the people was scooped up by our government and given to scientists to deliberate create really nasty viruses capable of wiping out a great many people. This was not an intentionally created bio weapon. Although it is an effectve bio weapon. This deadly virus was created, using the small furry animal method, so we could study influenza. The final aim being to sell the vaccine back to the people who funded it. What could possibly go wrong.
In 2000 / 2001 Porton Down in the UK was studying 'foot and mouth' disease. The word 'studying' requires some careful thought, some critical thought. Studying means finding a really virulent form of the disease. 'Finding' means creating a very deadly form of the disease by using the small furry animal method discussed above. Then producing this new form of the disease in quantity. What would take nature many thousands of years, if ever, can take just months in a well funded 'state of the art' labarotory. Anyway, this particular strain got out. That many cows were culled that we struggled to burn and then bury the bodies. I know, I watched it unfold as I watch this 'thing' unfold today.
Anyway, ten years ago we created a strain of the flu that one of the scientists involved called the worst thing you could ever imagine. Now, let us take her advice and imagine what that may look like. Or we could watch the news.
This is not a conspiracy theory. This is, as the title states, a discussion about how bad things could get. The worse thing that I can imagine is an airborne virus that spreads very easily via breathing within 2m of someone else who is also breathing. 80% of those who get it don't know they have it and spread it around for about 14 days. This virus, the one I am imagining, attacks the lungs and scars them for life. The virus suppresses the immune system and this damage is also permanent. The virus then goes on to attack the hosts blood. The virus disrupts the ability of the red blood cells to transport oxygen. The virus has one final trick. It attacks the brain and central nervous system. Taste and smell are initially impacted in the young who quickly regain this as they are full of life energy. Those who are not young have an imporant part of their brain targetted for destruction, the one that regulates breathing. Perhaps up to 5% of the population go from feeling OK to breathing out a pink spray before dying in about three hours, just for a dramatic flair. The psychological impact of this on family members, friends and the front-line Health workers would be dramatic.
Quite imaginative aren't I?
As far as I can tell, the worse thing that I can imagine looks like the thing we are all up against now. Hopefully I am wrong.
The young may not be dying in round one of this 'thing'. However, they may be acquiring a great deal of damage to their developing brains, central nervous systems, blood and immune systems. Which if correct, is far more devastating than old people dying.
Just to be clear, I know nothing more than any one of you. I have eyes that see and ears that hear. I have an imagination that is free from fear.
I am not saying the 'thing' we are up against now was created in a US govt funded lab a decade ago. I am saying that anyone of us could have created it by understanding the small furry animal story when we first hear it. A story that is over one hundred years old. The 'thing' we are up against has cousins in labs the world over. Some are more potent and others less so. Any one of these hundreds of labs can produce the 'thing' we are up against in quantity in hours. The 'thing' was not created by some 'Hitler' as a biological weapon. However, the 'thing' is not technically alive and is incapable of caring whether or not Mother Theresa created it or Mr Hitler. It was created by us to help us find a potent vaccine for flu. Of the hundreds of labs consuming billions of dollars, one of these 'things' has got out. In 2001 it was here in the UK. Today, it looks like China. It could have been anywhere.
The logic of deliberatley creating potent virus in order to study them produces results no different from acts of deliberately creating and then using, without thought, potent biological weapons. The same labs that create these unnatural horrors using vast quantities of our wealth, will be supplied with ever larger quantities of our collective wealth to create a cure.
Perhaps our curent problem is not as large as I imagine it to be. If it isn't, without change, be in no doubt that it is only a matter of time before even my imagination is overwhelmed by reality.
Those of you who have followed my blogs and perhaps read my books, can read all this without fear. I wrote this post without fear and I do believe that this 'thing' is as bad as I have imagined it could be.
It didn't have to be this way and it shouldn't be this way. If I am correct, this 'thing' will usher in the Dawn of A New Civilisation and that is something to look forward to. Getting there is going to be, if I am right, brutal.
For the record, I don't care either way.
It didn't have to be brutal but it will be. Either this 'thing' creates change or something even worse does. Unfortunately, it looks like both man and mankind would rather die than change a generations held belief.
If not this 'thing', how brutal do things need to be before we do change?
We can change in a heart beat. A literal heart beat.
Or we can choose to allow this 'thing' or a worse 'thing' to brutally force the change.
What change you may ask. I ask that you give it some critical thought, if capable. Or learn how if you cannot.
PS I wrote this in one go and I wrote it from the heart. I am not going to spell check it or grammar check it. I am not even going to bother reading it before publication. It is what it is.
You can ignore reality all you like. Good luck ignoring the consequences.
As we live through these interesting times I thought it may be an idea to 'imagine' how much more interesting 'things' could get.
Let me be clear, I cannot predict the future. What I can easily do is interpret the world around me and then point out what is obvious to me.
At school, when I was around 8 or 9, I remember the salient points but not the detail as to how an important vaccine was developed. Some well intentioned genious / evil monster injected a small furry animal with a dangerous disease and it died. A small blood sample from this poor unfortunate creature was injected into another perfectly healthy small furry animal and it died too. A small blood sample from this poor unfortunate creature was injected into another perfectly healthy small furry animal and it died too. A small blood sample from this poor unfortunate creature was injected into another perfectly healthy small furry animal and it died too. A small blood sample from this poor unfortunate creature was injected into another perfectly healthy small furry animal and it died too. A small blood sample from this poor unfortunate creature was injected into another perfectly healthy small furry animal and it died too. A small blood sample from this poor unfortunate creature was injected into another perfectly healthy small furry animal and it died too. A small blood sample from this poor unfortunate creature was injected into another perfectly healthy small furry animal and it died too. So far, so horrific. I am sure you are geting bored of reading the same sentence over and over. Imagine reading it 100 times.
Eventually, the small furry animals started dying slower and slower, then one survived. Blood from this one was injected into other fury animals, who were dying and some survived the unsurvivable. Fom this painstaking research / inhuman behaviour came a cure for a terrible disease.
That man is apparently some sort of hero but I refuse to recall his name or honour him in anyway. Instead of creating a cure, he may have decided to make an even more deadly virus. He would have injected the virus into a healthy animal, waited until it was really ill then injected some blood into another healthy animal. Read that sentence 100 times.
The difference between the two was one was developing a cure and the other making a virus far more deadly. The difference in action is just the moment at when the blood is drawn. One when the animal has exhausted itself battling the disease, the other when the disease is gaining the upper hand.
This was all hundreds of years ago and we are far more advanced today. We have computers and scientists and labs all over the world funded by the people. However, these computers and scientists are still less effective than simply infecting small furry animals with a virus and then injecting another small furry animal with its infected blood.
About a decade ago, 'we' succeeded. Wealth from the people was scooped up by our government and given to scientists to deliberate create really nasty viruses capable of wiping out a great many people. This was not an intentionally created bio weapon. Although it is an effectve bio weapon. This deadly virus was created, using the small furry animal method, so we could study influenza. The final aim being to sell the vaccine back to the people who funded it. What could possibly go wrong.
In 2000 / 2001 Porton Down in the UK was studying 'foot and mouth' disease. The word 'studying' requires some careful thought, some critical thought. Studying means finding a really virulent form of the disease. 'Finding' means creating a very deadly form of the disease by using the small furry animal method discussed above. Then producing this new form of the disease in quantity. What would take nature many thousands of years, if ever, can take just months in a well funded 'state of the art' labarotory. Anyway, this particular strain got out. That many cows were culled that we struggled to burn and then bury the bodies. I know, I watched it unfold as I watch this 'thing' unfold today.
Anyway, ten years ago we created a strain of the flu that one of the scientists involved called the worst thing you could ever imagine. Now, let us take her advice and imagine what that may look like. Or we could watch the news.
This is not a conspiracy theory. This is, as the title states, a discussion about how bad things could get. The worse thing that I can imagine is an airborne virus that spreads very easily via breathing within 2m of someone else who is also breathing. 80% of those who get it don't know they have it and spread it around for about 14 days. This virus, the one I am imagining, attacks the lungs and scars them for life. The virus suppresses the immune system and this damage is also permanent. The virus then goes on to attack the hosts blood. The virus disrupts the ability of the red blood cells to transport oxygen. The virus has one final trick. It attacks the brain and central nervous system. Taste and smell are initially impacted in the young who quickly regain this as they are full of life energy. Those who are not young have an imporant part of their brain targetted for destruction, the one that regulates breathing. Perhaps up to 5% of the population go from feeling OK to breathing out a pink spray before dying in about three hours, just for a dramatic flair. The psychological impact of this on family members, friends and the front-line Health workers would be dramatic.
Quite imaginative aren't I?
As far as I can tell, the worse thing that I can imagine looks like the thing we are all up against now. Hopefully I am wrong.
The young may not be dying in round one of this 'thing'. However, they may be acquiring a great deal of damage to their developing brains, central nervous systems, blood and immune systems. Which if correct, is far more devastating than old people dying.
Just to be clear, I know nothing more than any one of you. I have eyes that see and ears that hear. I have an imagination that is free from fear.
I am not saying the 'thing' we are up against now was created in a US govt funded lab a decade ago. I am saying that anyone of us could have created it by understanding the small furry animal story when we first hear it. A story that is over one hundred years old. The 'thing' we are up against has cousins in labs the world over. Some are more potent and others less so. Any one of these hundreds of labs can produce the 'thing' we are up against in quantity in hours. The 'thing' was not created by some 'Hitler' as a biological weapon. However, the 'thing' is not technically alive and is incapable of caring whether or not Mother Theresa created it or Mr Hitler. It was created by us to help us find a potent vaccine for flu. Of the hundreds of labs consuming billions of dollars, one of these 'things' has got out. In 2001 it was here in the UK. Today, it looks like China. It could have been anywhere.
The logic of deliberatley creating potent virus in order to study them produces results no different from acts of deliberately creating and then using, without thought, potent biological weapons. The same labs that create these unnatural horrors using vast quantities of our wealth, will be supplied with ever larger quantities of our collective wealth to create a cure.
Perhaps our curent problem is not as large as I imagine it to be. If it isn't, without change, be in no doubt that it is only a matter of time before even my imagination is overwhelmed by reality.
Those of you who have followed my blogs and perhaps read my books, can read all this without fear. I wrote this post without fear and I do believe that this 'thing' is as bad as I have imagined it could be.
It didn't have to be this way and it shouldn't be this way. If I am correct, this 'thing' will usher in the Dawn of A New Civilisation and that is something to look forward to. Getting there is going to be, if I am right, brutal.
For the record, I don't care either way.
It didn't have to be brutal but it will be. Either this 'thing' creates change or something even worse does. Unfortunately, it looks like both man and mankind would rather die than change a generations held belief.
If not this 'thing', how brutal do things need to be before we do change?
We can change in a heart beat. A literal heart beat.
Or we can choose to allow this 'thing' or a worse 'thing' to brutally force the change.
What change you may ask. I ask that you give it some critical thought, if capable. Or learn how if you cannot.
PS I wrote this in one go and I wrote it from the heart. I am not going to spell check it or grammar check it. I am not even going to bother reading it before publication. It is what it is.
You can ignore reality all you like. Good luck ignoring the consequences.
10 April, 2020
Interesting Times
Interesting Times
In case you didn't know, I hope you live in interesting times is a curse and not a blessing. We are living in interesting times.
Basically, we concurrently live in two distinctly different 'worlds'. One world is generally called the 'real world' and the other is called 'reality'.
In the 'real world', government is powerful and the banks are wealthy. In 'reality', are they?
This is a question for you to consider. Not just scan this text, simply to confirm your belief that I am either an idiot or an idiot savant. Whether or not I am right or wrong is unimportant.
Our 'real world' view is under attack from a 38kb strand of RNA 'reality'.
Please follow the government guidelines on social distancing and consider choosing to wear a homemade mask, when in and entering an enclosed space that isn't your home.
Are you aware of your choice to be fearful or thoughtful?
I simply ask that you recognise your fear when it arises and accept it as natural, real and of value.
Do you wish a Health Care worker to treat you in a state of fear or calm, thoughtful confidence?
My point is, fear is to be welcomed as an important visitor. When fear leaves and it will, thoughtfully consider their warnings and let your words and actions define you as calm and thoughtful.
A fearful man is percieved by others to be weak.
A calm and thoughtful man is percieved by others to be powerful.
It is your choice, do you wish others to percieve you as weak or powerful?
Take care
David
PS There are some people and organisations who will always try and make you fearful. Simply recognise those and consider avoiding them.
Be seeing you
05 April, 2020
Covid 19 - Prevention and Cure
First of all, let me reinforce the UK Government message of Stay at Home.
Now let me add, wear a (home made) mask when not in your home.
That fully covers the 'Prevention' part of this Covid 19 blog post.
A Youtube link below covers masks 'why' and another 'how'.
Prevention is the wrong word, the phrase should be 'reduce the transmission rate'.
Cure is the wrong word, let me use the phrase 'effective treatment'.
Stay Home and wear a mask when out will effectively reduce R - which is the rate of transmission.
If everyone reading this post shares this information with more people than those with Covid 19 share the virus with others, then we beat Covid 19 with far fewer deaths.
We need to increase R, which is the transmision rate of the knowledge contained within this simple blog post. For every 100 thousand people that could die, fewer than 100 would succumb to Covid 19.
(Assuming the knowledge contained within this post goes viral.)
The effective treatment is as the Youtube link below. I suggest that you make notes and when ill with Covid 19 you make your wishes known.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NkN8yCWSGus (why wear a mask)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZnVk12sFRkY&t=81s (how to make a mask)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zer6omW0vnU (effective treatment)
Should these links ever fail then please feel free to use your own initiative.
**************************************************************************
I extend my warmest thanks to Dr Eric Berg, Thomas DeLauer, Chris Martenson, Adam Taggert, all our Health Workers and the massive effort expended by our Governments on our behalf.
The text below is copied directly from the 'effective treatment' youtube clip on Sunday 5th 2020 09:00
1. There is a French study involving 36 patients targeting COVID-19. They used a medication called hydroxychloroquine along with an antibiotic, and 100% of the patients recovered within 6 days. They also did a second trial with 80 patients. It showed clinical improvement in all of those cases except for 2.
2. Dr. Vladimir Zelenko said that in 699 COVID-19 cases, there was a 100% success rate. He used hydroxychloroquine, z-pack, and zinc. He’s recommending to hit the virus hard and early with this protocol.
3. Dr. William Grace has been using hydroxychloroquine and an antibiotic with really good results—not one death.
4. There was a study by the NIH using zinc showing a decrease in morbidity relating to lower respiratory tract infections.
5. There was another study done by the NIH in vitro using hydroxychloroquine. They found it was a potent killer of the coronavirus.
Dr. Eric Berg DC Bio: Dr. Berg, 53 years of age is a chiropractor who specializes in Healthy Ketosis & Intermittent Fasting. He is the author of The New Body Type Guide and other books published by KB Publishing. He has taught students nutrition as an adjunct professor at Howard University. He no longer practices, but focuses on health education through social media. DR. BERG'S SHOP: https://bit.ly/2UZoWKI Follow us on FACEBOOK: fb.me/DrEricBerg Send a Message to his team: m.me/DrEricBerg ABOUT DR. BERG: https://bit.ly/2UUMRKY Disclaimer: Dr. Eric Berg received his Doctor of Chiropractic degree from Palmer College of Chiropractic in 1988. His use of “doctor” or “Dr.” in relation to himself solely refers to that degree. Dr. Berg is a licensed chiropractor in Virginia, California, and Louisiana, but he no longer practices chiropractic in any state and does not see patients so he can focus on educating people as a full time activity, yet he maintains an active license. This video is for general informational purposes only. It should not be used to self-diagnose and it is not a substitute for a medical exam, cure, treatment, diagnosis, and prescription or recommendation. It does not create a doctor-patient relationship between Dr. Berg and you. You should not make any change in your health regimen or diet before first consulting a physician and obtaining a medical exam, diagnosis, and recommendation. Always seek the advice of a physician or other qualified health provider with any questions you may have regarding a medical condition. The Health & Wellness, Dr. Berg Nutritionals and Dr. Eric Berg, D.C. are not liable or responsible for any advice, course of treatment, diagnosis or any other information, services or product you obtain through this video or site. Thanks for watching!
Now let me add, wear a (home made) mask when not in your home.
That fully covers the 'Prevention' part of this Covid 19 blog post.
A Youtube link below covers masks 'why' and another 'how'.
Prevention is the wrong word, the phrase should be 'reduce the transmission rate'.
Cure is the wrong word, let me use the phrase 'effective treatment'.
Stay Home and wear a mask when out will effectively reduce R - which is the rate of transmission.
If everyone reading this post shares this information with more people than those with Covid 19 share the virus with others, then we beat Covid 19 with far fewer deaths.
We need to increase R, which is the transmision rate of the knowledge contained within this simple blog post. For every 100 thousand people that could die, fewer than 100 would succumb to Covid 19.
(Assuming the knowledge contained within this post goes viral.)
The effective treatment is as the Youtube link below. I suggest that you make notes and when ill with Covid 19 you make your wishes known.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NkN8yCWSGus (why wear a mask)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZnVk12sFRkY&t=81s (how to make a mask)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zer6omW0vnU (effective treatment)
Should these links ever fail then please feel free to use your own initiative.
**************************************************************************
I extend my warmest thanks to Dr Eric Berg, Thomas DeLauer, Chris Martenson, Adam Taggert, all our Health Workers and the massive effort expended by our Governments on our behalf.
The text below is copied directly from the 'effective treatment' youtube clip on Sunday 5th 2020 09:00
1. There is a French study involving 36 patients targeting COVID-19. They used a medication called hydroxychloroquine along with an antibiotic, and 100% of the patients recovered within 6 days. They also did a second trial with 80 patients. It showed clinical improvement in all of those cases except for 2.
2. Dr. Vladimir Zelenko said that in 699 COVID-19 cases, there was a 100% success rate. He used hydroxychloroquine, z-pack, and zinc. He’s recommending to hit the virus hard and early with this protocol.
3. Dr. William Grace has been using hydroxychloroquine and an antibiotic with really good results—not one death.
4. There was a study by the NIH using zinc showing a decrease in morbidity relating to lower respiratory tract infections.
5. There was another study done by the NIH in vitro using hydroxychloroquine. They found it was a potent killer of the coronavirus.
Dr. Eric Berg DC Bio: Dr. Berg, 53 years of age is a chiropractor who specializes in Healthy Ketosis & Intermittent Fasting. He is the author of The New Body Type Guide and other books published by KB Publishing. He has taught students nutrition as an adjunct professor at Howard University. He no longer practices, but focuses on health education through social media. DR. BERG'S SHOP: https://bit.ly/2UZoWKI Follow us on FACEBOOK: fb.me/DrEricBerg Send a Message to his team: m.me/DrEricBerg ABOUT DR. BERG: https://bit.ly/2UUMRKY Disclaimer: Dr. Eric Berg received his Doctor of Chiropractic degree from Palmer College of Chiropractic in 1988. His use of “doctor” or “Dr.” in relation to himself solely refers to that degree. Dr. Berg is a licensed chiropractor in Virginia, California, and Louisiana, but he no longer practices chiropractic in any state and does not see patients so he can focus on educating people as a full time activity, yet he maintains an active license. This video is for general informational purposes only. It should not be used to self-diagnose and it is not a substitute for a medical exam, cure, treatment, diagnosis, and prescription or recommendation. It does not create a doctor-patient relationship between Dr. Berg and you. You should not make any change in your health regimen or diet before first consulting a physician and obtaining a medical exam, diagnosis, and recommendation. Always seek the advice of a physician or other qualified health provider with any questions you may have regarding a medical condition. The Health & Wellness, Dr. Berg Nutritionals and Dr. Eric Berg, D.C. are not liable or responsible for any advice, course of treatment, diagnosis or any other information, services or product you obtain through this video or site. Thanks for watching!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)