Now, if you have read most of my work you may be aware that I believe that Heaven on Earth is brought about by promoting our own individual inner humanity, after which a civilisation will naturally come into existence.
We start this natural process by encouraging our own inner humanity and as we become better human beings we can then start encouraging others by deed and example. At some point we may begin coaching those who seek our advice. None of which is coercive.
In this way an aggressive male will transform himself into a physically capable human male. The benefit to the man is that he no longer needs to be aggressive to demonstrate his power. His power is noted by others both consciously and sub consciously. We all continually test each other and a true human male will easily pass all these tests. Our society contains a vast number of aggressive males but a civilisation would, by definition, contain vast numbers of physically capable human males.
Now where do you believe women fit into the grand scheme of things as described above? Can you imagine how a young lady can help a young man more readily become a human male rather than continue his existence as an aggressive male?
After watching 77 Fiamengo files it has become clear to me that a feminist is the equivalent of an aggressive male. Thus we are living in a very advanced society when groups of feminists can easily provoke or encourage men to act aggressively and then severely punish them from a position of innocent victim-hood. We are now at the point where clumps of feminists can even take down male human beings for occasional lapses or even for nothing at all.
A clump of feminists are eager to display verbal and physical aggression, which were the domain of the aggressive male discussed above. An aggressive male is keen to display physical coercion but a clump of feminists are eager to use their tools to impose their will on individuals and groups. The use of coercion in any form is ugly and non-human.
A feminist would have you believe that a feminine woman is somehow weak and dependent upon an aggressive male for protection. Well, feminists would have you believe a great many things. I suggest that a feminine woman is the equivalent of a physically capable human male. A feminine woman is a true human female. As such, she will develop her own humanity and the humanity of those around her. Ideally, she will have a mate and they will both develop their humanity together. Perhaps, creating life and raising the child in a loving and very much human environment. Or not, a feminine woman is powerful and more than capable of making her own decisions and dealing with situations as they arise without worry, concern or fear.
A feminine woman will naturally dampen the aggressive feelings and actions of an under developed human male, also known as an aggressive male or what I would call a male member of society. What concerns me most, as an aggressive male on the path towards becoming a true male human being is dealing with an enraged mob of feminists? Upsetting a female member of society is very easy and can happen without intent or even awareness. Once this upset female shares her feelings with a clump of feminists, then the 'war' starts.
Luckily, Janice Fiamengo has given her advice on this topic of engagement with a clump of feminists. DON'T APOLOGISE, as they take this as an admission of guilt. I would suggest that they see this as a sign of weakness and attack. Therefore, never demonstrate any weakness. Not to the feminists or any of societies structures that get involved, such as police, social workers, human resources or your boss. Just continue to be a human being and regardless of provocation, do not allow your inner aggressive human male to display any aggression. In other words, be that which you have chosen to be, a human being. Society may well punish you anyway but what would a human being expect from a society? Certainly not justice. A human being can just display by words and deeds that they are a human being and by that act alone will encourage others to do the same until human beings are in ascendance and birth an actual human civilisation that could easily be described as Heaven on Earth.
By maintaining your humanity and not allowing fear or aggression to dictate your actions you will also have an influence on a few individuals in the feminist mob which is attacking you. These may well leave the feminist camp and travel the path to humanity. A far greater effect will be on the feminist mob itself, taking down a true human being will have a massive psychological impact on their group psyche. I do mean massive. The feminist mob will be very careful not to do it again and thus inadvertently accelerate the transformation of society into a civilisation.
The previous paragraph is an excellent example of very high order critical thought and you are invited to re-read and ponder it at your leisure.
The aim of this piece is not to tell you what is or is not feminine. The true aim of this piece is not to establish gender norms for men and women. The goal of this piece is to encourage you, the reader, to either begin or continue the development of your humanity and to offer some encouragement and reasons for doing so.
The true aim of this piece was for me to consider my responses and behaviour should a clump of feminists wish to test my humanity. In hindsight, this is easy. Simply pass the test (by remaining human) and realising the truth, a society is not a civilisation.
I now no longer fear being tested. I now have an intellectual curiosity about whether I would rise to the challenge and pass the test. A failure to do so would just mean that I am not yet a true human being - which I already know.
My training continues and Janice Fiamengo has an important role to play. In watching her videos, I must see the injustice and contradictions. I must choose to note any fear or anger I may understandably feel but that these feelings undermine my inherent humanity. Fear and anger are just tools to help recognise an injustice, fear and anger will not help in creating a civilisation as only love and understanding can do that.
So, what do you think of feminism? Is it based on love and understanding or on anger and fear?
Remembering that only love and understanding can destroy fear and anger.
:-)
This piece was written in around three hours and not edited as I ought to do something else now, like eat food and say good morning to my partner.
I started writing this piece half way through
www.youtube.com/watchv=yUUavtvWrTo&index=7&list=PLHt1Hh27h4BuYuWu54bQrUOClZ_lPJ3X3
Fiamenga file 78
No comments:
Post a Comment