The planet is increasingly controlled by ever fewer people. We could call this capitalism or globalisation. We could blame the Rothschilds or Central Bankers. Wrong. Wrong. Wrong. Wrong.
We are all each to blame on an individual basis.
The very few cannot control the many without the many helping.
That is all there is to this blog.
I must attempt to explain why the few controlling the many is a bad idea. First off, this sort of power attracts those who wish to wield it. Anyone wishing to wield such power must NEVER be allowed to have it.
The power comes from the many. Why would any sane, rational, caring human being want to wield power over the rest of us? Yet the many do give away their power to those they believe should not have it. Many of us call this democracy. I don't.
There are many reasons for the many to give away, a small portion of, their power to support a common good. Such as roads, hospitals, farms and industry. It would make sense to form a governing body to oversee these public works. You could add prisons and a justice system, then pensions and then I have just described the very thing I said was wrong. The few controlling the many.
The difference is subtle but vital. Accountability.
The larger a government gets, the less accountable it is to an individual. In other words, the more the fewer control the many then the less control we have over our own lives.
This is just wrong. Assuming you agree, how can we remedy the situation? The solution(s) are straightforward and implementation painless.
1) Don't give away your power
2) Behave in a manner that you fully believe is appropriate.
Number one is readily explained. Always question those who believe themselves to have authority over you. Get them to explain themselves to you. Do this on an intellectual level. If there is to be threats and violence, let them initiate it.
Number two reinforces number one. Even those with low paid 'demeaning' jobs can hold their heads up high in any company, should they choose to do those jobs well.
Complaining and moaning are two things I excel at but both activities are ones where I am actively giving away my power.
That is all there is to it. Just two 'rules' based on just one concept, ACCOUNTABILITY.
The 'executive' summary is just one sentence.
Make sure that those you give a portion of your power to are accountable to you and be accountable for all your own actions.
In my opinion, anything less than that is the path towards your own ever increasing enslavement. A huge step backwards for all mankind and we have already taken it!
Quite simply, we are on a path of increasing inequality and decreasing standards of living for all but a few.
Those who truly believe in big government generally mean their big government and not the opposition. Which I believe means that even they don't actually believe in big government either. They just believe in themselves being right and that the opposition is simply wrong. Marvellous, subject everybody to big government when even its biggest proponents believe it to be wrong half the time! The alternative is a small government that can be, largely, ignored. Which in the UK was around 100 years ago. I suspect that the same was true of America. However, the creation of the Federal Reserve has been crucial to the increasing power of the few over the many.
I suppose you would like to know how we get from a large mostly unaccountable government to a small accountable one? Simple, just be patient and live mostly by the two rules I gave out earlier. Unbelievably, the same is true regarding the wealth inequality too! (Although, I regularly give out tips and hints on how to accelerate this process. This blog is a 'treasure chest' to those who understand it. You are welcome.)
In the coming year I will publish one article, on the third Friday of, each month. (They are already written, including the end of year review!)
These will attempt to illuminate the concept of accountability as summarised in this post.
As an end of year review, perhaps I ought to mention brexit and Trump. The system gave us a choice between what it believes is right and proper and a stupid alternative. Those voting for the 'stupid' alternative are deemed to be deplorable and stupid. This is obvious. As fewer and fewer people control the many, globalisation / centralisation, then we get one official view. The 'right and proper' view versus what the 'stupid' masses think. As a critical thinker who is mindful of humanity, I write this blog. Just because we, the people, have voted against the establishment, don't expect the establishment to go quietly into the night. It would be foolish to believe that central planners giving us a simple controlled choice, don't have an agenda for either choice we make.
My point is this, each of us should be accountable for our own actions. It should make no difference to most people who the US vote in for their mascot. An amateur golfer, a property developer or a another Clinton. Increasing centralised power means that, eventually, one of these mascots could end the lives of billions of people.
I end with another of my factual historical examples. After world war two, where millions died, Churchill said this. 'The only thing harder than getting Hitler to go to war with us, was keeping him at war with us.'
If Clinton had got in, I would have expected her to say the same about Putin, after world war three. Millions would not have died but billions.
WHAT I JUST DID WAS HIGHLIGHT AN EXAMPLE OF THE OFFICIAL NARRATIVE BY INTRODUCING A 'FACT' THAT DOES NOT SUPPORT THE OFFICIAL NARRATIVE.
I AM REASONABLY CERTAIN THAT CLINTON WOULD ENJOY BEING A WELL RESPECTED HISTORICAL FIGURE, JUST LIKE CHURCHILL IS.
HOWEVER, IF MY LITTLE QUOTE IS TRUE, IT IS, WAS CHURCHILL 100% GOOD AND HITLER 100% BAD, AS THE OFFICIAL NARRITIVE STATES?
Obviously, this could easily cause many people to have an uncontrolled emotional response. Perhaps verbalised with words like Nazi and Jew hater. This would indicate one thing and one thing only, their conditioning by the central planners / globalists is strong.
The same thing applies to those fearful of Trump or Bremainers worrying about the future.
A fearful being seeks protection by a larger being. In this example, the central planners. This is what the few do, basically terrorise us. A terrified human makes very poor choices.
An authentic human being is not fearful of a property developer or a new set of trading rules. Be mindful of your emotional responses, Those who seek to control us will always use our emotions to their own advantage and against ours.
We can all become authentic human beings but it is not something that the central planners / globalists want. They want the exact opposite, easily controlled and managed populations corralled into geographic areas. Which is what they have.
You have a great winter pagan festival, call it Christmas if you will.
Have a think about what you believe an authentic human being would be like. Then be one. Acknowledge those who help and become aware of the institutions who do not.